Wealth in America Survey 2008
Northern Trust’s third annual Wealth in America survey reveals millionaire
investors’ responses to the real estate market turmoil, and generational
differences in beliefs about the ongoing economic uncertainty.
Two broad themes permeate Northern Trust’s 2008
Wealth in America study: a “steadfastness” of millionaire
households despite negative economic news, and a distinct
generational difference among high-net-worth households in
their attitudes and approaches to their finances.
The Wealth in America study1 explores affluent investors’
attitudes toward the stock market and investments, asset allocation
plans and using professional advisors; their views on
philanthropy and wealth transfer; and their plans for retirement.
Here’s a quick look at some of the key findings from the report.
Optimism Remains, But Concerns Rise
Despite the onslaught of negative economic news, most
millionaire households remained optimistic about the performance
of the U.S. stock market in 2008. Some foresaw a decline
in interest rates, while others were confident about corporate
earnings growth or expected strong U.S. economic growth.
Yet not everyone remains optimistic. According to the study,
those who expect negative or flat market performance in 2008
almost doubled since last year’s survey, from 6% to 11%. This
negative outlook is based mainly on their expectations of slowing
economic growth and a continuation of the downturn in the
real estate market.
“I don’t think the economy will show much improvement
this year,” says Robert Rogers*, a real estate investor who did
not participate in the survey. “We have the mortgage crisis and
credit crunch, and the price of oil is at an all-time high. I don’t
expect much improvement until after the presidential election.”
Real Effects of Real Estate Slump
Many respondents said that one change in their investing
behavior during the previous year was to lessen their focus on real
estate investments. Despite the increased market volatility in the
latter half of 2007, millionaires’ asset allocation has remained stable
since 2005. The largest change has been in real estate investments
— millionaires’ allocation since 2005 has dropped from 13%
to 6%, due to a decline in asset values and investment sales.
But Rogers says he’s not selling any of his real estate any time
soon. “The real estate values have taken a hit in the last year, so
I plan to wait until they rebound. They’re still producing a good
income stream,” he says.
The Generation Gap
The study found that Gen X millionaires (ages 28 to 42) were
more optimistic about the stock market’s performance in 2008
than other age groups, with 28% expecting the market to increase
by at least 10%. Only 14% of Boomers (ages 43 to 61) and 9% of
the Silent Generation (ages 62 and older) were that optimistic.
“I think we’ll see a steady improvement in the stock market
over the next year,” says Jon Morris, a Gen X entrepreneur.
Generational differences were also found in asset allocation.
The study reported that Gen X millionaires employed a more
sophisticated approach than older millionaires. This can be
seen in their higher allocations to alternative asset classes such
as hedge funds and private equity. Gen X households have 23%
of their assets in alternatives, compared with 13% for Boomers
and 10% for Silent Generation millionaires.
“In the past, I’ve invested primarily in publicly traded stocks,
though I’ve diversified my portfolio by investing in art,” Morris
says. “But I’m already planning a discussion with my financial
advisor about my options for investing in alternative asset classes.”
Three in five millionaires (60%)
now describe themselves as
relying mainly on their advisors
when making investment
decisions, up from 55% in 2005.
More Seek Out Advisors
Perhaps because of the increased complexity of the securities
markets and the greater availability of investments focused on
alternative asset classes, millionaire households have become
more advisor-oriented during the past two years. Three in five
millionaires (60%) now describe themselves as relying mainly
on their advisors when making investment decisions, up from
55% in 2005. Most of the increase has been in the portion of
investors who are “advisor-directed” (where the advisor makes
most or all investment decisions) rather than “advisor-assisted”
(where the individual consults with the advisor, but makes the
final decision for him- or herself).
Gen Xers, despite their more aggressive risk profile, were
more likely than older generations to be advisor-assisted and
less likely to be advisor-directed. For many business owners
like Morris, depending on an advisor for direction or assistance
is not only about navigating complex investment issues, but
also a product of a limited schedule. “I am definitely reliant on
my advisor. I just don’t have the time to manage my investments
personally, so I need to lean heavily on my advisor for
guidance,” says Morris.
As has been the case for many years, stock, bond and mutual
fund selection remained the service most used by high-net-worth
households in 2007. However, the use of retirement planning services has increased significantly during the past year, as you
might expect given the large number of Baby Boomers who are
entering the critical retirement planning phase.
The Wealth in America 2008 survey provides interesting
insight into the behavior and beliefs of millionaire households. If
you would like to see the complete survey results, please visit
northerntrust.com/wealthinamerica.
1 Northern Trust’s Wealth in America study was a nationwide survey of
1,014 millionaire households conducted by Phoenix Marketing International in
October and November of 2007.
* Name changed for privacy purposes
[top] |