Please be advised you are now leaving the Northern Funds section and being directed to a site maintained by Northern Trust. Please click OK to continue.
    Northern Trust Logo

    Northern Institutional Funds’ Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures


    Northern Institutional Funds has delegated the voting of portfolio securities to the Investment Adviser. The Investment Adviser has adopted proxy voting policies and procedures applicable to Northern Trust Corporation and its affiliates (the "Northern Proxy Voting Policy") for the voting of proxies on behalf of client accounts for which the Investment Adviser has voting discretion, including the Portfolios. Under the Proxy Voting Policy, shares are to be voted in the best interests of the Portfolios.

    A Proxy Committee comprised of senior investment and compliance officers of the Investment Adviser has adopted certain guidelines (the "Proxy Guidelines") concerning various corporate governance issues. The Proxy Committee has the responsibility for the content, interpretation and application of the Proxy Guidelines and may apply these Proxy Guidelines with a measure of flexibility. The Investment Adviser has retained an independent third party (the "Service Firm") to review proxy proposals and to make voting recommendations to the Proxy Committee in a manner consistent with the Proxy Guidelines. The Proxy Committee will apply the Proxy Guidelines as discussed below to any such recommendation.

    Northern Institutional Funds  
    The Proxy Guidelines provide that Northern Trust will generally vote for or against various proxy proposals, usually based upon certain specified criteria. As an example, the Proxy Guidelines provide that Northern Trust will generally vote in favor of proposals to: The Proxy Guidelines also provide that Northern Trust will generally vote against proposals to:
    1. repeal existing classified boards and elect directors on an annual basis; 1. Elect director nominees that sit on more than four public company boards, or, if the nominee is a CEO, on more than two public company boards;
    2. Appoint a lead independent director: 2. Classify the board of directors;
    3. Request that the board of a company be comprised of a majority of independent directors; 3. Require directors to own a minimum amount of a company stock in order to qualify as a director or remain on the board;
    4. adopt a written majority voting or withhold policy (in situations in which a company has not previously adopted such a policy) 4. Require directors to own a minimum amount of a company stock in order to qualify as a director or remain on the board;
    5. Request a company to submit its poison pill plans for shareholder ratification; 5. Impose age and term limits unless the company is found to have poor board refreshment and director succession practices;
    6. lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for charter and bylaw amendments; 6. adopt multi-class exchange offers or dual class recapitalizations;
    7. lower supermajority shareholder vote requirements for mergers and other business combinations; 7. require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve mergers and other significant business combinations;
    8. Reduce the par value of common stock; 8. require a supermajority shareholder vote to approve charter and bylaw amendments;
    9. implement a reverse stock split; 9. Adopt certain social and environmental proposals deemed unwarranted by the company’s board of directors; and
    10. approve an ESOP (employee stock ownership plan) or other broad based employee stock purchase or ownership plan, or increase authorized shares for existing plans; 10. Eliminate, direct, or otherwise restrict charitable contributions.
    11. Request that a company take reasonable steps to ensure that women and minority candidates are in the pool from which board nominees are chosen or that request that women and minority candidates are routinely sought as part of every search the company undertakes.  


    In certain circumstances, the Proxy Guidelines provide that proxy proposals will be addressed on a case-by-case basis, including those regarding executive and director compensation plans, mergers and acquisitions, ratification of poison pill plans, a change in the company's state of incorporation and an increase in authorized common stock.

    Except as otherwise provided in the Northern Proxy Voting Policy, the Proxy Committee may vote proxies contrary to the recommendations of the Service Firm if it determines that such action is in the best interests of a Portfolio. In exercising its discretion, the Proxy Committee may take into account a wide array of factors relating to the matter under consideration, the nature of the proposal and the company involved. As a result, the Proxy Committee may vote in one manner in the case of one company and in a different manner in the case of another where, for example, the past history of the company, the character and integrity of its management, the role of outside directors, and the company's record of producing performance for investors justifies a high degree of confidence in the company and the effect of the proposal on the value of the investment. Similarly, poor past performance, uncertainties about management and future directions, and other factors may lead the Proxy Committee to conclude that particular proposals present unacceptable investment risks and should not be supported. In addition, the Proxy Committee also evaluates proposals in context. For example, a particular proposal may be acceptable standing alone, but objectionable when part of an existing or proposed package. Special circumstances may also justify casting different votes for different clients with respect to the same proxy vote.

    The Investment Adviser may occasionally be subject to conflicts of interest in the voting of proxies due to business or personal relationships it maintains with persons having an interest in the outcome of certain votes. For example, the Investment Adviser may provide trust, custody, investment management, brokerage, underwriting, banking and related services to accounts owned or controlled by companies whose management is soliciting proxies. Occasionally, the Investment Adviser may also have business or personal relationships with other proponents of proxy proposals, participants in proxy contests, corporate directors or candidates for directorships. The Investment Adviser may also be required to vote proxies for securities issued by Northern Trust Corporation or its affiliates or on matters in which the Investment Adviser has a direct financial interest, such as shareholder approval of a change in the advisory fees paid by a Portfolio. The Investment Adviser seeks to address such conflicts of interest through various measures, including the establishment, composition and authority of the Proxy Committee and the retention of the Service Firm to perform proxy review and vote recommendation functions. The Proxy Committee has the responsibility to determine whether a proxy vote involves a conflict of interest and how the conflict should be addressed in conformance with the Northern Proxy Voting Policy. The Proxy Committee may resolve such conflicts in any of a variety of ways, including without limitation the following: (i)voting in accordance with the Proxy Guidelines based recommendation of the Service Firm; (ii) voting in accordance with the recommendation of an independent fiduciary appointed for that purpose; (iii)voting pursuant to client direction by seeking instructions from the Board of Trustees; or by (iv) voting pursuant to a "mirror voting" arrangement under which shares are voted in the same manner and proportion as shares over which Investment Adviser does not have voting discretion. The method selected by the Proxy Committee may vary depending upon the facts and circumstances of each situation.

    The Investment Adviser may choose not to vote proxies in certain situations. This may occur, for example, in situations where the exercise of voting rights could restrict the ability to freely trade the security in question (as is the case, for example, in certain foreign jurisdictions known as "blocking markets"). In circumstances in which the Service Firm does not provide recommendations for a particular proxy, the Proxy Committee may obtain recommendations from analysts at the Investment Adviser who review the issuer in question or the industry in general. The Proxy Committee will apply the Proxy Guidelines as discussed above to any such recommendation.

    This summary and the Northern Proxy Voting Policy and Proxy Guidelines as adopted by the Investment Adviser, are posted in the Account Resources section of the Northern Institutional Funds’ website, You may also obtain, upon request and without charge, a paper copy of Northern Proxy Voting Policy and Proxy Guidelines or a Statement of Additional Information by calling 800-637-1380.

    Information regarding how the Portfolios voted proxies, if any, relating to portfolio securities for the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 will be available, without charge, upon request, by contacting the Investment Adviser at 800-637-1380 or by visiting the SEC’s website,


    An investment in the Money Market Funds is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency. Although the Funds seek to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Funds.

    Please carefully read the summary prospectus or prospectus and consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of Northern Institutional Funds before investing. Call 800-637-1380 to obtain a summary prospectus or prospectus, which contains this and other information about the Funds.

    ©2019 Northern Institutional Funds | Northern Institutional Funds are distributed by Northern Funds Distributors, LLC, not affiliated with Northern Trust.