Skip to content

The Weekender

My weekly perspective on global market developments and their potential broader implications

Gary Paulin

Gary Paulin

Head of International Enterprise Client Solutions
As Head of International Enterprise Client Solutions, Gary focuses on strengthening Northern Trust's relationships with key clients across Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific at the highest levels of their organisations, principally their chief investment officers and chief executive officers.
JULY 8, 2023

 

Fighting in the gaps

From B.H Liddell Hart’s Strategy:

Only 2% of all military victories were a result of a direct attack on an enemy’s main army. Most success came from attacking the flanks, from the untraditional, or from fighting in the gaps.”

So where might there be “gaps” for allocators and investors? Where are the scarcities, the value opportunities, and the uncrowded trades?  Well, I travelled to Monaco last week for the annual Fund Forum to try and find out. I find Fund Forum a great venue to test theories, ask awkward questions, and listen to both what’s said as well as what’s unsaid or overlooked. It’s often in these gaps where the biggest opportunities lie. And where were the gaps this year? Weaker bonds/higher yields, value, the UK, Japan (surprisingly), Emerging Markets, and commodities. They love AI and loath Bitcoin. Few had heard of Conway’s book Material World, even fewer of the Yale paper suggesting current ESG incentives are counterproductive.  And not one person had heard about Space Solar. Or knew a spot welder. 

“All I want to know is where I’m going to die, so I’ll never go there.” – Charlie Munger

Many I spoke to last week seem to have attached themselves to the idea that rates and volatility are heading lower, and that pre-pandemic programming is returning: long bonds and long duration. Now, volatility matters here, since a lot of marginal liquidity is being run on platforms and by “machines” that use vol-targeting risk frameworks. This means they deploy more capital (often with leverage) as volatility falls. Momentum builds around the trend, contrarian views get rolled, shorts cover, and a positive feedback loop envelops. With VIX at 14 and Nasdaq at 52w highs as I write this (5 July), that may describe the current tape. However, although these periods can last for a long time, when they reverse thy often do so quickly, and  the damage can be brutal, even existential. And so, I believe it pays to question this narrative as I expect a key trigger is about to be pulled – a break-out in the risk-free rate – a destination many might wish to avoid. In advance. 

Invertiere, immer invertiere!

“Invert, always invert,” was the quote made famous by German mathematician Carl Jacobi and adopted by Charlie Munger. It seems appropriate within the context of the risk-free rate – the 10y – for it seems posed at a critical juncture. Now, despite all the focus on the Fed, inverted yield curves and so on, it’s the risk-free rate we use to discount future profits. Get this right, get equities right. And what’s price signalling? Well, despite an incredibly bullish context (falling inflation, recession fears, Chinese debt-deflation, two of the largest bank failures in history) the 10y hasn’t budged. Could this forewarn of an alternative view where recession morphs to resilience or even growth? Could this be why the equity rally is broadening to include more cyclicals, small caps, and even transportation stocks?  As I’ve discussed previously, the homebuilders continue to defy the naysayers, with home prices in the US now up for a third straight month. The stock market is often the best economist. And if she is right this time, this new narrative should support areas like the UK, Japan and Brazil. Regions you could purchase a lot of with Apple’s market cap (which now buys you the FTSE and most of the IBOV). But for this change to occur, it needs a new narrative. And I know just the bloke to deliver it: John Maynard Keynes. 

Move over Milton, John’s got this  

We’re armchair monetarists (at least I am). We’ve grown accustomed to the idea that monetary policy works with “long and variable lags,” we obsess over Quantitative Tightening, the Fed’s Balance sheet, Powell’s tie colour, and extrapolate possible outcomes from there. But I think we’re watching the wrong channel. I think we need to spend more time watching a channel more frequented by our parents and grandparents (which makes it very un-cool.)  There we will learn about good old fashioned state largesse, about “shovel-ready” projects, and why muscular industrial policy traditionally associated with depression or wars can be a growth multiplier.  It’s called Keynesianism. We now have the war, lest a race, against the climate, against AI supremacy, and in securing the materials to drive both. We now have industrial policy the scale of which is like nothing since the post WWII period. The Fed applies the brakes as the government presses the gas, putting more money into the pockets of corporates and consumers whilst driving scarcity of competing resources. We’re seeing this with labour (job hoarding, strikes at UPS) and it’s disturbing the normal translation of higher rates to higher unemployment. And since we haven’t invested in new capacity, utilisation rates should rise which will impact price. Yes, base effects work to lower headline inflation. But they will soon roll over and when they do, if we haven’t fixed the roof (by adding capacity), the next rain could become a flood (aka inflation). Yet everyone I queried on this feels comfortable with the 10Y sub 4%. But what if it’s over 6%? That’s a scenario now worth considering.

The impacts of Military Keynesianism

Ashtead is a UK-listed stock with the majority of its business in the US. They just reported full-year revenue growth ahead of expectations, at 24% (!). Open their slide deck. Take a look at slides 16-19. Here they talk of $2T in likely stimulus over 3 or so years – a manufacturing super-cycle. On slide 16, note the sectors they expect to be impacted. It makes sense, I think, to over-index the suppliers and regions that feed into those sectors. Not only are many of them deep value (UK, Brazil,) some are undergoing reform (UK, Japan) and will benefit should a new narrative form around ESG that favours engagement/abatement. The UK, EU, Japan, South Korea, and Australia are all part of the US State Department’s Mineral Security Partnership. And the UK is a very “special” friend, it seems, being deemed a “domestic source” under both the Defence Production and Inflation Reduction Acts. So, closer economic ties may one day be reflected in closer valuations. This with a starting multiple of 14x CAPE in the UK v 28x for US. Now that’s a massive gap. One I would happily be fighting in.

Resource wars, nothing new

The race to secure critical materials for geo-strategic purposes is nothing new. Indeed, the West’s restriction of GPU chip exports and China’s reaction with its own curbs on gallium and germanium is a well-run playbook. During WWI, for example, the UK had to lobby the Swiss to persuade Germany, their enemy, to send them precision optics to ensure they had enough binoculars and telescopic sights to assist with range finding, a prerequisite for military success. Thanks to state largesse and muscular industrial policy, Germany had cornered the precision glass market, scaling what was before then a niche industry via huge subsidies. Sound familiar? What’s fascinating about this story is how it ended. As Ed Conway writes in Material World, the Germans actually gave the Brits the binoculars! But only in return for something they were short of, but that the Brits had cornered: rubber! So, where are the scarcities in this arms race? Where are the gaps? Well, as discussed, it may no longer be in the ephemeral. But it might be in the material world: in atoms not bytes, in things not ideas, in hands not heads, and in welders not coders. Software can’t eat that world, although it’s critically dependent on it. And this at a time software is now eating software. Yes, “AI will build AI,” so says Jensen Huang. And he should know. He’s the CEO of Nvidia.  

Concentration risks

Now, I don’t want to seem I am beating up on Apple. I still think the large Tech platforms express the principal scarcities of this AI revolution (and many others). They own the datasets, the compute power, have a monopoly on the chips and importantly, control enormous, nonreplicable distribution channels that can be utilised for highly accretive new products (see Threads). With AI, they can retire their coders or make then way more productive. So, their power and market concentration could even increase. Sure, at 35% of the S&P it’s toppy, but in previous technology revolutions it’s been higher. Take railroads in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Transport stocks accounted for well over 50% of the market. That said, I do think it’s time to start looking outside the US, for there are better ways to express mean reversion, and a reversal of flows from the ephemeral to material, the former more dependent on the latter to survive. What’s fascinating is you can find companies exposed with starting yields 2x gilts, even lower earnings multiples, and with inflation sensitivity baked in. For free. Surely that’s a better and safer investment than one that pays a fixed return at a time prices are not (fixed or falling). And consider the regions these assets are in: the UK, Japan, Australia, and Brazil. Do they suffer from concentration risk? Far from it. You can’t even get UK investors to buy UK shares for example. Though I think that might be about to change. We might be about to summon the spirit of George Ross Goobey and the return of cult of equity. 

The trade of the decade?

As you know, I believe the UK could be an extraordinary opportunity on a 10 year view (as is Japan and Brazil). Not only is it ludicrously undervalued, but it’s also about to undergo significant reforms which could unlock the 2nd largest savings market on the planet. This when it’s attracting foreign capital. According to the UN World Investment Report it’s the number 1 destination for FDI in Europe and number 3 in the world, and it’s already a centre for AI.  Just pausing on AI for a second, a limiting factor for successful application is access to data. Well, in the field of biotechnology and health science, an area the UK excels in, who has the largest patient data set on the planet but the NHS?  Could this be one reason why Open AI have chosen London as their first non-US location? And Palantir are coming too. Might they have been in discussion with the government as to our defence capabilities? I wonder. But back to capital markets. Yes, reforms help: think less red-tape, tax-incentives for home bias, lower reg-cap requirements (Solvency 2) and boosting research coverage/sponsorship by reversing aspects of MIFFID 2 (unbundling?). But often, the most powerful incentive to money flows is price. And if the world becomes more open to the importance of the material world, the UK stands to benefit. We might see a large value transfer from the ethereal to material, from the US (on 28x) to the UK (on 14x). Next week we will hear more from Jeremy Hunt at his Mansion House Speech (Monday). And ou might remember my comment after the Atlantic Declaration; I think Sunak may have negotiated a free trade agreement with the US but just hasn’t told us yet. Perhaps he was waiting for Biden to visit before announcing it? If he is, he won’t wait long, Biden is scheduled to be visiting next week. For more on this read Change.

The biggest gap, in Space

We’ve discussed space-based solar as a potential solution for the energy transition. Unlike wind and land-based solar it’s continuous (think baseload), offers energy density closer to that of nuclear than other renewables, but at a lower cost and without the issues with waste. CalTech recently demonstrated the ability to wirelessly beam power from satellites to Earth (so no technology impediment) and the UK (and Saudi) have committed capital to build a facility in an area considered the centre of the previous energy revolution: the North Sea. Now, I never seemed to get much interest on the topic. That might be about to change thanks to two other blokes (well, their business) by the name of Oliver Wyman, who have actually done some research on this topic. You can see their findings here. But clearly, the biggest gap of all, one few seem to be fighting in, is space.

“I don’t believe in astrology; I’m a Sagittarius and we’re sceptical.” - Arthur C Clarke 

 

 

NEITHER THE INFORMATION NOR ANY VIEWS EXPRESSED CONSTITUTES INVESTMENT ADVICE AND IT DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE SPECIFIC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, FINANCIAL SITUATION AND THE PARTICULAR NEEDS OF ANY SPECIFIC PERSON WHO MAY VIEW  THIS MATERIAL.

These are my own personal views, not those of my employer. This report is not intended for retail customers. Any further disclosure, use, distribution, dissemination or copying of this report or any of the information herein is strictly prohibited. The information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change at any time without notice. Any person relying upon information in this report shall be solely responsible for the consequences of such reliance. This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or other advice nor does it constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any security, commodity, currency or other product. Readers, including professionals, should under no circumstances rely upon this information as a substitute for their own research or for obtaining advice from their own advisors. Internet communications are susceptible to alteration and Northern Trust shall not be liable for the message if it has been altered, changed or falsified.

Under no circumstances should you rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from your own professional legal or tax advisors. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.

© 2023 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability in the U.S. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. For legal and regulatory information about individual market offices, visit northerntrust.com/terms-and-conditions.

Receive The Weekender

Register your interest in receiving Gary's commentary direct to your inbox.