Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Corporations
    5. Family Offices
    6. Financial Advisors
    7. Financial Institutions
    8. Individuals & Families
    9. Insurance Companies
    10. Investment Managers
    11. Nonprofits
    12. Pension Funds
    13. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search

Subscribe to Economic Trends & Insights

Discover our latest insights on all economic news, from breaking headlines to long-term trends.

Follow Carl Tannenbaum

Discover the latest economic insights from our chief economist on social media.
Global Economic Research

Modernizing Inflation Measurements

We need to modernize the methods used to gauge consumer prices.

No economic topic has commanded more attention this year than inflation.  Higher prices are the leading concern for consumers, investors, businesses and policymakers.  With so many eyes following it, now may be an inopportune time to observe that the calculation of inflation is in desperate need of repair.

The goal of a consumer price index (CPI) is to approximate the cost of living.  In the U.S., the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) assembles the CPI by sampling a vast amount of data in the field.  Prices are collected by surveying retailers (or landlords, for housing estimates).  Traditionally, these surveys were performed by BLS agents directly visiting stores to observe prices on shelves.  Amid pandemic shutdowns, this practice was suspended.  Where possible, prices have been backfilled using surveys by telephone or email, or manual review of prices posted online.  But this has been an inconsistent means of collecting data.

Once prices are gathered, they are assembled into a basket with weights that reflect typical consumer expenditures.  These weights are assigned by surveying consumers: some are interviewed directly, while others keep a diary of all purchases over a two-week period.  During the pandemic, in-person interviews were suspended, and the movement to telephone-only interviews reduced response rates.

The U.S. CPI methodology was considered the gold standard when it launched in 1978.  It performed well for decades thereafter, but it is showing its limitations.  Basket weights are refreshed every two years, but as we have recently experienced, consumer behaviors can shift significantly in a much shorter time.  (The basket itself is showing its age, including categories like photographic film, video tape rental and stationery supplies.)  Meanwhile, the share of online purchase activity has grown, but the conventional retail focus of the BLS approach has excluded this channel.

To address these limitations, the BLS and Department of Labor commissioned an independent study from the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) to improve the CPI methodology.  The 159-page report offered the following recommendations:

  • Explore big data approaches to capture prices automatically. Online shopping portals can be scraped (that is, read programmatically) to learn offered prices.  Market data vendors collect cash register data from retailers directly and could provide exact, timely point-of-sale records to BLS.  While not free, these vendors may be more cost-effective than employing surveyors.
  • Revise the panel approach to determine baskets by using sources like payment card transactions to gauge consumer expenditures.
  • Use alternative data to index hard-to-measure categories like healthcare and housing.

Consumer price measurements are in desperate need of updating.

The NASEM researchers also proposed creating separate indices by consumers’ income tiers.  The experience of inflation is uneven, with lower-income workers often exposed to higher prices.  This would build on the existing sub-indices for specific geographic regions and for “wage earners and clerical workers.”

In response, the BLS committed to working on each of NASEM’s recommendations, starting with a plan to reweight the basket annually instead of every two years.  Complete redevelopment of a well-seasoned methodology should not be done in haste, but when better approaches are available, they should be incorporated.

None of this is meant to cast doubt on recent trends in the CPI.  There is no question that prices are rising, and new computation methods are unlikely to produce significant changes in measured inflation.  But efforts to improve price measures will make them more useful going forward.

Information is not intended to be and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Under no circumstances should you rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from your own professional legal or tax advisors. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.

© 2022 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability in the U.S. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. For legal and regulatory information about individual market offices, visit


Ryan James Boyle portrait

Ryan James Boyle

Chief U.S. Economist
Ryan James Boyle is the Chief U.S. Economist within the Global Risk Management division of Northern Trust. In this role, Ryan is responsible for briefing clients and partners on the economy and business conditions, supporting internal stress testing and capital allocation processes, and publishing economic commentaries.


How high do interest rates have to go to control inflation?

The world needs a stronger World Trade Organization.