Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Corporations
    5. Family Offices
    6. Financial Advisors
    7. Financial Institutions
    8. Individuals & Families
    9. Insurance Companies
    10. Investment Managers
    11. Nonprofits
    12. Pension Funds
    13. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search

How the SEC’s Latest Proposal Might Impact the Face of Mutual Funds

Changes to Liquidity Risk Management Program rules include the use of swing pricing and a hard close.

It has been six years since the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted three significant rules and reforms impacting open-end mutual funds: Rule 22e-4 requiring Liquidity Risk Management Programs, the addition of paragraph (a)(3) to Rule 22c-1 to allow the optional use of swing pricing, and Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which introduced Forms N- PORT and N-CEN.

On November 2, 2022, the SEC released a new proposal, this time combining proposed changes covering all three of these topics into one 429-page release which would change the game for open-end funds yet again. With the stated objective of improving liquidity risk management programs to “better prepare funds for stressed conditions and improve transparency” and to “mitigate dilution of shareholders’ interests in a fund,” the proposed changes would alter the face of the US mutual funds industry and have broad impacts to how funds are sold and serviced in the US.

The proposal includes several substantial changes to Liquidity Risk Management Program rules, including changes to bucketing classifications and Highly Liquid Investment Minimums, modifications to Form N-PORT reporting including a stepped-up filing frequency, and other filing amendments (N-1A and N-CEN). However, the mandatory use of swing pricing, a model that adjusts a fund’s current NAV in order to protect non-trading investors from bearing the impact of portfolio trading costs, and the “Hard Close” that is the SEC’s suggested solution to operationalize swing pricing, may be the most controversial of the proposed rule changes.

Mandatory Swing Pricing

Following the 2016 changes that allowed optional swing pricing, none of the US open-end funds adopted the practice. Although several global asset managers use swing pricing in their European products, the practical application in the US market has not followed. Reasons for this include the trading model and the significant proportion of US mutual fund assets that are held by retirement investors, making the timing of order receipt in the US market less conducive to swing pricing.

The new proposal would require open-end funds other than money markets and ETFs to use swing pricing as an anti-dilution tool. In a departure from the optional swing pricing practice that is in place today, funds would be

required to swing the NAV on any day that the fund was in net redemptions, with no swing threshold. For days with net purchases that exceed 2% of the fund’s net assets, swing pricing would also be required.

While the swing factor may still be determined on a periodic basis, the proposal outlines the SEC’s expectations for the calculation of the swing factor, including a standardized approach to estimate the costs of selling or buying a pro-rata amount of each portfolio investment, (a “vertical slice”), spread costs, commissions, fees, and taxes associated with portfolio investment transactions, and market impact. In the case of redemptions, the proposal sets a market impact threshold at 1%. Notably, the swing pricing administrator cannot be a fund’s portfolio manager.

Impact of the Hard Close

On the surface, the hard close proposal seems simple: for an order to receive the current day’s NAV, the order must be received by the fund’s transfer agent or a registered clearing agency (currently, only the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) in the US), by the pricing time (generally 4:00 pm EST). However, in practice, this change would not be so simple – while the SEC outlines the hard close proposal as the answer to the US industry’s ability to implement swing pricing, the impacts would be far-reaching.

US 401(k) plans held $6.3 trillion in assets at the end of Q3 2022 (per the Investment Company Institute and Department of Labor), with $3.8 trillion of those assets (61%) investing in mutual funds. The current market practice and agency trading model allows those investors to direct transactions in their retirement accounts until the prospectus closing time for the fund. Intermediaries and retirement plan recordkeepers are responsible to uphold the fund prospectus cutoffs to investors, but may transmit orders to the funds after close, until a mutually agreed upon time. The additional administrative time allows for order aggregation and/or netting at the plan or omnibus account level.

The proposal acknowledges that systems and business practices would require significant changes, and that some intermediaries may establish cutoff times that would be earlier than the fund prospectus cutoff times. The proposal cites the advancement of technology as the foundation for the belief that the intermediary cutoff times would not need to be significantly earlier than the pricing time established by the funds. Orders would be considered irrevocable, with no trade cancellations permitted.

The impact on the end investor is noted in the proposal, but the SEC’s belief is that the orders are not time sensitive as most fund shareholders are long term investors. The proposal cites the protections provided by swing pricing as a benefit that would outweigh the adverse impact of an earlier cutoff, and notes that investors wishing to transact until 3:59 PM ET could “generally place orders with the fund’s transfer agent to retain this option.” In practice, this option would not be feasible for investors holding fund shares through their 401(k) plan accounts.

Although the proposal is specifically applicable to open-end mutual funds other than money markets and ETFs, a move to a hard close would likely impact other products offered in 401(k) plans, such as Collective Investment Trusts, as intermediaries and retirement plan recordkeepers would likely align systems processes and cutoffs times across fund types rather than supporting different processes for mutual funds and CIT’s. This further broadens the impact on the end investor.

The proposal notes that in Europe, where swing pricing has long been used as a tool, the hard close is common. There are two significant distinctions between the European market standard and the SEC proposal, however. First, swing pricing in Europe is not required – it is permitted. Second, the hard close construct was a European market standard prior to the movement toward intermediated positions and toward defined contribution plans, providing investors with opportunity up front to understand and accept any earlier cutoff times, rather than losing flexibility on their order timing after the fact.

The proposal has outlined several specific questions for comment. All comments on the proposal were due by February 14, 2023.


© 2023 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability as an Illinois corporation under number 0014019. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. This material is directed to professional clients only and is not intended for retail clients. For Asia-Pacific markets, it is directed to expert, institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. For legal and regulatory information about our offices and legal entities, visit northerntrust.com/disclosures. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author's employer, organization, committee or other group or individual. The following information is provided to comply with local disclosure requirements: The Northern Trust Company, London Branch, Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Securities LLP and Northern Trust Investor Services Limited, 50 Bank Street, London E14 5NT. Northern Trust Global Services SE, 10 rue du Château d’Eau, L-3364 Leudelange, Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, incorporated with limited liability in Luxembourg at the RCS under number B232281; authorised by the ECB and subject to the prudential supervision of the ECB and the CSSF; Northern Trust Global Services SE UK Branch, UK establishment number BR023423 and UK office at 50 Bank Street, London E14 5NT; Northern Trust Global Services SE Sweden Bankfilial, Ingmar Bergmans gata 4, 1st Floor, 114 34 Stockholm, Sweden, registered with the Swedish Companies Registration Office (Sw. Bolagsverket) with registration number 516405-3786 and the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Sw. Finansinspektionen) with institution number 11654; Northern Trust Global Services SE Netherlands Branch, Viñoly 7th floor, Claude Debussylaan 18 A, 1082 MD Amsterdam; Northern Trust Global Services SE Abu Dhabi Branch, registration Number 000000519 licenced by ADGM under FSRA #160018; Northern Trust Global Services SE Norway Branch, org. no. 925 952 567 (Foretaksregisteret), address Third Floor, Haakon VIIs gate 6 0161 Oslo, is a Norwegian branch of Northern Trust Global Services SE supervised by Finanstilsynet. Northern Trust Global Services SE Leudelange, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Basel is a branch of Northern Trust Global Services SE. The Branch has its registered office at Grosspeter Tower, Grosspeteranlage 29, 4052 Basel, Switzerland, and is authorised and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA. The Northern Trust Company Saudi Arabia, PO Box 7508, Level 20, Kingdom Tower, Al Urubah Road, Olaya District, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 11214-9597, a Saudi Joint Stock Company – capital 52 million SAR. Regulated and Authorised by the Capital Market Authority License #12163-26 CR 1010366439. Northern Trust (Guernsey) Limited (2651)/Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited (29806)/Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited (15532) are licensed by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission. Registered Office: Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 3DA. Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Ireland) Limited (160579)/Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Ireland) Limited (161386),  Registered Office: Georges Court, 54-62 Townsend Street, Dublin 2, D02 R156, Ireland.