Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Corporations
    5. Family Offices
    6. Financial Advisors
    7. Financial Institutions
    8. Individuals & Families
    9. Insurance Companies
    10. Investment Managers
    11. Nonprofits
    12. Pension Funds
    13. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search

Municipal Bonds: How Utilities May Deliver Resilience In Recession

U.S. municipal utility bonds – backed by issuers who provide water, sewer and electricity – have limited losses during past recessions, providing investors with an opportunity to fortify their portfolios against economic weakness by investing in strategies holding utility bonds.


STRONG FUNDAMENTALS AID UTILITIES’ RISK PROFILES

Higher interest rates, the result of the Federal Reserve’s inflation fight, have spurred investor concerns about recession. A deteriorating economic outlook combined with changing interest rates could continue to create volatility in the bond market. To help navigate this risk, investors can construct municipal bond strategies to include utilities. With reliable income and stable credit ratings, utilities historically have helped buffer portfolios against volatility during a recession.

WHO ISSUES MUNICIPAL UTILITY BONDS

Utilities such as water, sewer, and electricity form the bedrock of society’s infrastructure. This essentiality underlies the sector’s strong credit quality and it makes utility bonds an excellent fit for municipal bond portfolios. City government enterprises such as the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power or the Jacksonville Electric Authority provide these services. In these cities, the utilities directly bill residents. In other cases, the utility provides services as a wholesaler, selling power to other utilities that bill residents. The Washington Suburban Sanitary District is an example of a wholesaler, where its water and sewage services ultimately reach nearly 2 million residents of Prince George’s and Montgomery counties in Maryland. These types of government-supported entities can issue tax- exempt municipal bonds.

Utilities issue revenue bonds to fund their capital projects such as new power generation and upgrades to water distribution and wastewater treatment.

Payments to bondholders are secured by revenues to utilities. Municipal utility bonds are typically high quality, with only a handful of large defaults over the last 50 years. Moreover, recent federal infrastructure spending has alleviated some of the need for bond issuance to cover ongoing heavy capital needs, making this sector more attractive.

THE FUNDAMENTAL STRENGTH OF UTILITY BONDS

We think these fundamental characteristics support the credit strength of the utility sector:

  • Monopolies: Municipal utilities are almost always monopolies. This virtually eliminates competitive pressures, which lends to more stable profits and cash flows.
  • Essential services: Consumption of water, sewer and power is unlikely to significantly decline during an economic downturn. Even during the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, revenues at key municipal utilities remained resilient.
  • Rate-setting power: Unlike for-profit utilities, municipal utilities do not typically need a regulator’s approval to raise rates. Well-run utilities typically raise rates modestly every year or two to avoid large, politically difficult increases.
  • Ability to pass through costs: Many utility rate structures comprise fixed- and variable-rate components that insulate their finances from commodity price spikes. Higher natural gas prices drive up costs to generate power at gas-fired plants, yet many issuers can pass on higher commodity costs to customers. Utilities have also increased their base charges to offset declining use due to conservation efforts and use of rooftop solar.
  • Affordable rates: Municipal utility rates are generally more affordable than investor-owned, for-profit utilities.
  • Strong financial metrics: Utility issuers tend to hoard cash. The median water/sewer issuer had 549 days cash for fiscal 2021, meaning that the average issuer could cover more than a year of operating expenses with zero revenues (see Exhibit 1). We also use debt service coverage ratios — the amount of annual revenues, after expenses, divided by debt service— as a key metric to evaluate issuers. Coverage typically averages a robust two times debt service.

  • Nimble management: Utilities develop playbooks to manage through recessions, including slowing capital plans, tapping cash reserves, trimming expenses and refinancing debt. These management actions can keep credit metrics steady through tough times.
  • Strong ratings: Like most municipal bond issuers, utilities are highly rated. According to the ratings agency Standard & Poor’s, more than half of its 600 water/sewer ratings are rated in the AA or AAA categories.
  • Low default rates: Utility bonds defaults rates are lower than the average for municipal bonds. According to Moody’s Investors Service, only three electric utilities and two water/sewer utilities defaulted from 1970 to 2021.

HOW DO WE EVALUATE A UTILITY BOND FOR RESILIENCY?

Credit analysis is a key part of our municipal bond selection process. As part of this process, we examine an issuer’s financial metrics, management quality, governance (rate-setting procedures), legal framework (bond covenants) and affordability of an issuer’s capital plans. We also review the local economy, demographics, access to ample water or power supply, and regulatory risks. Most importantly, we track trends in credit factors because these metrics can precipitate downgrades to published ratings and negatively impact bond pricing.

We monitor for risks including:

  • Weakening governance: Increasing political pressure over the rate- making process can result in weakened financial performance.
  • Regulatory risks: Power issuers with older power plants can face elevated costs to reduce pollution. Sewer authorities, particularly those in older cities, often face federal regulations to reduce combined sewer overflows into waterways after heavy rain events, which are becoming more common due to climate change. In both cases, we consider the cost of remedies.
  • Population loss and/or economic decline: A shrinking population means fewer ratepayers to maintain aging infrastructure. Increasing poverty puts more pressure on utilities to keep rates low, which can compromise other goals.
  • Reduced financial strength: Key metrics include liquidity, debt service coverage and debt affordability.

We also opportunistically seek to invest in issuers that we believe will improve their credit quality, which can lead to bond price appreciation. Signs of improving credit can include forward-looking management, capital plans that are commensurate with resources, economic vibrance and growing liquidity.

MANAGING UTILITIES IN A MUNICIPAL BOND PORTFOLIO

The broader utility sector (including both water/sewer and electric) is the third largest in the diverse municipal market, after general obligations and transportation. The sector is generally high grade: the Bloomberg water/sewer index average credit quality is AA1/AA2 and electric is AA3/A1. Our municipal bond strategies tilt to high-quality bonds, particularly when the economy is expected to slow.

Depending on market conditions and the portfolio mandate, we may seek opportunities for additional yield available for lower-rated utility credits. For example, investors from AA rated bonds to A rated could gain, on average, 56 basis points of additional yield. This additional spread may be compelling for some accounts and would depend on our analyst’s view of the credit.

We generally choose highly liquid bonds from large population centers as opposed to small municipalities. For example, the New York Water and the Los Angeles Department of Power and Water were both among the 15 most traded issuers in 2022, allowing for liquidity even during difficult markets and adding to this sector’s appeal.

Historic sector performance is similar to the municipal market as a whole, but with resiliency amid volatility. For example, during three years of negative municipal performance during economic downturns (2008, 2013, and 2022), utility sectors showed resiliency during those years (see Exhibit 4), especially compared to high yield bonds.

CONCLUSION: UTILITIES TO FORTIFY A MUNICIPAL BOND PORTFOLIO

We believe an allocation to municipal utilities aid a municipal bond portfolio’s ability to limit losses amid volatility and an economic downturn. Strong fundamental characteristics such as monopoly market positions and rate-setting ability support their excellent credit quality. Should the U.S. economy fall into recession, some credit metrics could be modestly dented, but we do not anticipate widespread downgrades.



For Asia-Pacific markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. The information contained herein is intended for use with current or prospective clients of Northern Trust Investments, Inc. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. Northern Trust and its affiliates may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, and its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor. Opinions and forecasts discussed are those of the author, do not necessarily reflect the views of Northern Trust and are subject to change without notice.

This report is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, adviser risk and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives

will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance

or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe Northern Trust’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Past performance is not guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by Northern Trust. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For additional information on fees, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult a Northern Trust representative.

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are Northern Trust’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve. Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.

Northern Trust Asset Management is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc. Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K, NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.

© 2023 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. P-050223-2869705-050124