
Katie Nixon, CFA, CPWA®, CIMA®
Chief Investment Officer, Northern Trust Wealth Management
Citing a “shift in the balance of risks” between the labor market and still-sticky inflation, the Federal Reserve commenced its easing cycle this week, cutting the fed funds target rate by 25 basis points and reiterating its data-dependent approach. With the Fed’s move baked into expectations, reaction was somewhat muted in bond and equity markets.
In this Weekly Five, we answer top investor questions on the meeting, our views vis a vis the Summary of Economic Projections, and the impact of recent labor market revisions on economic and market outlooks.
Please note that we will not publish The Weekly Five on September 26. The article will return on October 3.
What primary factors did the Fed cite in its decision to lower the fed funds target rate?
As anticipated, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds target rate by 25 basis points for the first time since December 2024, primarily driven by labor market concerns that have risen as jobs growth has slowed over the past several months, concurrent with a rise in unemployment claims.
Notably, inflation, particularly the Fed’s preferred measures of personal consumption expenditures (PCE) and core PCE, remains above the Fed’s 2% target, with policymakers anticipating it is likely to remain elevated for the next year or more. On balance, the rate cut, to 4.00%-to-4.25%, reflected a growing concern about the economic outlook. Fed Chair Powell characterized this cut as “risk management” to address the growing risks in the labor market, despite the upside risk to inflation from tariff policy.
How are recent labor market data revisions impacting economic and market outlooks?
Fed Chair Powell continues to follow a “meeting-by-meeting” approach to monetary policy, noting a heavy reliance on the incoming data — which presents a complication given the prospect for meaningful future revisions.
The monthly nonfarm payroll report is a good example. As we’ve seen recently, the report can be heavily revised on a monthly basis, and annual revisions can paint a substantially different picture. As widely reported earlier this month, for the annual revision through March 2025, the U.S. economy produced 911,000 fewer jobs than previously reported. The revisions were more than 50% higher than last year’s adjustment and the largest on record going back to 2002. On a monthly basis, they suggest average job growth of 76,000 less than initially reported. The data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting approach will make forecasting difficult for economists and market strategists alike, and could potentially inject volatility into financial markets.
The Weekly Five
Put recent portfolio performance in context with market and economic analysis that goes beyond the headlines.
Has your outlook for monetary policy for the remainder of 2025 and 2026 changed in light of the September Fed meeting?
Our view of expected rate cuts has not changed, and we anticipate two more 25-basis-point cuts for the remainder of the year. This is consistent with the consensus view, which places 90% odds on an additional 50 basis points of cuts in 2025. The Fed’s own Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) also indicates two more quarter-point cuts this year — an increase from the one cut anticipated back in June.
The market is anticipating three to four additional cuts next year. However, we do not foresee the Fed being that aggressive in 2026, noting that the Fed’s and our own view is that inflation is likely to remain sticky, with the updated SEP showing an uptick in the core inflation rate to 2.6% in 2026. We concur that inflation will remain a wild card, likely continuing to trend higher through the end of this year and into next.
Notably, the Fed nudged up its growth forecast for 2025, 2026 and 2027 — and slightly reduced its forecast for the unemployment rate for next year and 2027. We also agree with the growth forecast, believing that the U.S. economy may avoid a recession and may even accelerate in the second half of 2026 as the rate cuts work their way through the various transmission channels.
What was the bond market reaction?
The bond market had a mixed response to the news: Intuition was that rates would fall, but the reality was that the market had well-anticipated the policy action and had, in fact, priced in only a small probability of a more meaningful cut. Both the 2- and 10-year Treasury yields rose marginally after the Fed meeting and decision, and the 10-year Treasury yield hit a two-week high just days after hitting the psychologically important 4% level.
How did equity markets react?
Similar to bond markets, equity investors had anticipated the Fed’s move, though the trading session was volatile. After an initial spike on the news, equity markets ended Wednesday mixed, with the S&P down 0.1%.
Interestingly, equity markets resumed their upward move into new record territory in the balance of the week, shrugging off any anticipated volatility from Friday’s $5.3 trillion option expiration. A notable performer in the tech space was Intel, which sold a $5 billion stake to rival, NVIDIA, in a deal to jointly develop chips for PCs and datacenters: Intel's share price was up over 20% for the week. While valuations for the tech sector and the broader market remain far above historical levels, valuations alone are rarely a catalyst for repricing.